tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9537945.post9149712740055492280..comments2008-06-20T14:48:39.351-05:00Comments on DeploymentEngineering.com - The Blog: InstallShield Stand Alone Build AnnouncementChristopher Painterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12167478740431444267noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9537945.post-24607294404548378452008-06-20T14:45:00.000-05:002008-06-20T14:45:00.000-05:00There's an old saying where I come from, it goes: ...There's an old saying where I come from, it goes: "Fool me once... shame on... shame on you... ...Ya fool me... I can't get fooled again"<BR/><BR/>Am I the only person that's worried that Mac-resso-shield is going to some how screw this up for the rest of us? I can see it now, 'instead of giving 10 SAB licenses, let's charge for each and now make Premier users pay on a sliding scale based on the number of SAB instances they have installed, and we can control it all with our invasive & mathematically insecure FLEXnet licensing solution'... ARGH.<BR/><BR/>Ya know what, just shoot me now and let some new guy come in behind me with WiX, NSIS, Inno Setup, IzPack or whatever other install tool is least buggy this quarter. (*sigh*)Erik Garciahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05000255264159168845noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9537945.post-30304467985983484102008-06-20T09:15:00.000-05:002008-06-20T09:15:00.000-05:00I have an idea InstallShield could pursue. What if...I have an idea InstallShield could pursue. What if they included a single license for the Standalone build with Professional but the Premier has the 10 licenses? <BR/><BR/>Policing this would be difficult but not impossible as they already have the ability to setup license servers for networks.<BR/><BR/>Christopher, great work in keeping up with this issue. I still think some type of support for having a build machine is essential to any professional development effort.Danhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07138642769361999429noreply@blogger.com